Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

What Is Art: A Look in to Popular Culture of Mona Lisa Smile

"What is art?  What makes it good or bad?  And who decides?" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003) Professor Katherine Watson asks of her students in "Mona Lisa Smile." What Professor Watson is doing is having her students define a movement in popular culture of the time.  The movie "Mona Lisa Smile" uses art to depict high culture in this time, as the girls of the fictional college, Wellseley, are members of an elitist society made up of all white families, which separates them from their professor, as she is considered of low-culture because of her marital status as much as her upbringing and breeding.  With the use of such things as advertisements and paint by numbers art sets, Professor Watson explains to the audience not only how popular culture shifts and moves but how it compares to high culture, which is a similar motif in many other films, such as "Titanic."  Ultimately, this film is a good example of how high culture and popular culture differ as well as come together.
First, the story of "Mona Lisa Smile" moves in a linear pattern, flowing in a sequential order; however, it does start at the end, with a reformed student, Betty Warren, writing an editorial about her now favorite professor, Ms. Watson.  As Betty narrates, the movie opens with Professor Watson as she rides a train towards Wellseley, on her way to her first job as an arts history teacher.  It does not use flashbacks, only offers backstory through the gossiping and later questioning of their professor. The audience learns that Professor Watson is in fact, an unmarried woman with low breeding, but Betty states, "It was whispered that Katherine Watson, a first year teacher from Oakland State, made up in brains what she lacked in pedigree" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003).  Professor Watson, having gone to school, and presumably grown up in a liberal state, moves to one of the most conservative states in the United States, and has to adjust to their standards and way of life.  She is called "subversive," which, in that place, is considered a profound insult. 
Professor Watson is depicted as a woman way ahead of her time.  She says in the movie, in response to an editorial written by Betty, "I didn't realize that by demanding excellence I would be challenging . . . the roles you were born to fill" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003).  Enraged, she confides in another professor and further states, "A finishing school disguised as a college . . . I thought that I was heading to a place that would turn out tomorrow's leaders, not their wives" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003).  Professor Watson has a difficult time adjusting to this conservative way of life.  In the end though, she does have a profound effect on the girls in her class, except maybe not the way she'd intended. They do not go off to become the leaders of tomorrow, but instead think about the world around them in a different way. 
Secondly, the theme of popular culture in this movie is shown through the art that appears all throughout.  The first piece of art shown is actually an advertisement for Camel Cigarettes.  The ad reads, "When your courses are set, and a real dream boat you've met . . . have a real cigarette!" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003).  The ad reads as though enjoying a cigarette is synonymous with good grades and love, every woman's "desire."  This is a reflection of the culture that would read the paper or magazine this advertisement is featured in.  It is not just high culture advertising though, it would be considered popular culture, and according to John Storey in Cultural Theory and Popular Cutlure: An Introduction (2009), advertising is considered the main reason of cultural decline by Leavis (p. 24).  Advertising itself is the reason for the lessening of culture and the standard way of living according to Leavis (Storey, 2009, p. 24).  In reading and agreeing with the advertisements of the day, ladies of Wellesley are debasing themselves to a lower culture then they were born into.
 Then, Professor Watson explains to her students about Vincent Van Gogh, "With the ability to reproduce art, it is available to the masses.  No one needs to own a Van Gogh original . . . they can paint their own: Van Gogh in a box ladies, the newest form of mass distributed art, paint by numbers" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003).  In the 1950s, paint by numbers were all the rage, bringing high culture art to low culture individuals.  Van Gogh, a painter who is considered to be fine art, is now produced for the masses, transforming it to popular culture.  Van Gogh is no longer high culture for the elite to enjoy, but part of popular culture for everyone to enjoy. "Ironic, isn't it?  Look at what we have done to the man who refused to conform his ideals to popular taste, who refused to compromise his integrity.  We have put him in a tiny box and asked you to copy him" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003), Professor Watson explains to her students, which is a good example of how high culture becomes part of popular culture.
Storey (2009) explains another point with regards to high culture, that Stuart Hall and Paddy Whannel believe that not all high culture is good, nor is all popular culture bad, that there are shades of gray based on popular discrimination (p. 52).  In the case of "Mona Lisa Smile," Professor Watson is asking her students to look at the world around them from outside of themselves, to see what others see.  She says in the movie, "Contemporary art . . . what will future scholars see when they study us?  A portrait of women today.  There you are ladies" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003).  Professor Watson is showing them a slide of an advertisement which is exactly what a Wellseley graduate is expected to do, what she is trained to be: cook, clean, and care for her husband and children.  That is all she is expected to do, regardless of pedigree, education, or even what she wants.  The advertisements of the day are not good or bad, simply are a reflection of what is. 
Finally, the story told in "Mona Lisa Smile" is comparative with other movies of similar interests, such as "Titanic," in which an upper class woman is challenged by a man of lower-class to be herself regardless of her station in life.  She appears to be all that she should be, and yet early on in the film, the audience is shown that she has appreciation for the art of Monet, which in her time is a contemporary artist, but who is now considered fine art even though it is mass produced for everyone to see and enjoy, which shows another example of where high culture becomes popular culture.

In conclusion, "Mona Lisa Smile" tells a gripping story about a woman who is attempting to break the social norm by giving the women of Wellseley College something more to aspire to.  Professor Watson shows the students in her classroom just how effective art can be in regards to culture, whether it is high or low, good or bad, does not matter, but that each woman sees for herself the truth and questions that truth.  The art depicted in the film is a reflection of the setting in which the story is told from, which is conservative, privileged, and elitist, where the women at Wellseley are taught, "Your sole responsibility will be taking care of your husband, and children . . . but the grade that matters the most is the one he gives you" (Schiff, Schindler, Goldsmith-Thomas & Newell, 2003), meaning her husband.
References
Schiff, P. (Producer), Schindler, D. (Producer), and Goldsmith-Thomas, E. (Producer) & Newell, M. (Director). (2003). Mona Lisa Smile [Netflix].  United States: Revolution Studios.
Storey, J. (2009). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture An Introduction. Dorchester, Dorset: Pearson Education Limited.

To Wed or Not To Wed

It is often wondered if Shakespeare wrote his characters based on people whom he knew in his life, because the characters are so vivid and so diverse that no two are anything alike. It’s his female characters that especially stand out. Take for example Kate from Taming of the Shrew and Miranda from the Tempest, who are as opposite as can be: Kate is outspoken and often speaks her mind, while Miranda is mindful and listens to everything her father says.  Kate dislikes Petruchio when they first meet, but Miranda falls in love at first sight of Ferdinand.  Kate is forced to marry Petruchio, where Miranda is in agony to watch Ferdinand suffer in order to prove his love for her. Despite the two female characters being so very different, their fathers want what's best for them: good marriages to men who will provide for them.
First, the women of the two plays are as different as night and day as one is straightforward in speech while the other is heedful.  Kate from Taming of the Shrew is seen as being too outspoken and is the reason for the play taking on the name 'shrew.'   When Hortensio finds out that Petruchio is looking for a wife, he begins telling Petruchio about Kate, but describes her as "intolerable curst,/ And shrewd and froward so beyond all measure" (I.ii. 70-71).  True to form, when we first see Kate, she doesn't hold her tongue at all and speaks plainly what's on her mind. In her first scene, Kate says to her father, "I pray you, sir, is it your will / To make a stale of me amongst these mates?" (I.i.57-58). She mocks him outright, showing that she is disagreeable by nature, but she is not wrong.  Instead of standing there quietly while Baptista basically pimps out his daughters to suitors, she demands to know his intentions.  It is forward and unbecoming of a woman to speak out in front of would-be husbands and to speak so abruptly to her father, and thus makes her look like the shrew everyone calls her.  Whereas in the Tempest, Miranda's first scene shows her hanging on to her father's every word, listening and obeying him completely. Prospero, explaining her heritage, keeps making sure she's paying attention, "Sir, most heedfully" (I.ii.79) and “O, good sir, I do” (I.ii.89) is how she responds to him.  Miranda is completely taken by the story that her father tells to her and listens as an obedient child should. She behaves just as an obedient daughter should behave unlike Kate of Taming of the Shrew.  Kate is outspoken while Miranda is not.
Next, we see the differences in the two females even further upon their reactions of meeting their intended fiancés within the plays.  The audience is shown that Kate does not like Petruchio when they first meet in the second act during the exchange between the two to be wed.  Kate says to Petruchio to be gone, "Moved,” in good time. Let him that moved you hither/Remove you hence. I knew you at the first/You were a moveable" (II.i. 190-191).  However, Petruchio insists on calling Katherine Kate in his ploy to subdue the terrible shrew, to which Kate replies, "Well have you heard, but something hard of hearing./They call me Katherine that do talk of me" (II.i.177-178).  At her first opportunity, she's already correcting Petruchio and being as obstinate as possible. All throughout the next several lines, she contradicts him at every point, insisting that she is not his and that she does not love him, "Too light for such a swain as you to catch,/And yet as heavy as my weight should be" (II.i.198-199).  However, with Miranda, she has a very different take on her future husband. She sees him at the behest of her father and instantly thinks him handsome and falls in love. When Miranda first sees Ferdinand, she says, "I might call him/A thing divine, for nothing natural I ever saw so noble" (I.ii.413-414). She admits to herself aloud saying that she has feelings for Ferdinand almost immediately, "Why speaks my father so ungently? This/Is the third man that e'er I saw, the first/That e'er I sighed for. Pity move my father/To be inclined my way!" (I.ii.440-443). So, while Kate tries to dismiss Petruchio, Miranda falls head over heels for Ferdinand and wants nothing more than to be with him.
The final major difference is indeed the fact that both women have opposite responses to whom they are to marry: while Kate refuses, Miranda is eager to hers. Petruchio explains in no uncertain terms that she is to be his wife, whether she likes it or not, "setting all this chat aside,/Thus in plain terms: your father hath consented/That you shall be my wife, your dowry 'greed on,/And, will you, nill you, I will marry you" (II.i.258-61). Kate continues to refuse, even to the point of wishing him dead, "I’ll see thee hanged on Sunday first" (II.i.289).  At this point in the play, Kate still refuses to change and to stay the shrew, still expressing herself, no matter how difficult everyone finds her.  However, in the Tempest, Ferdinand professes his love directly to Miranda saying, "Oh, if a virgin,/And your affection not gone forth, I’ll make you/The queen of Naples" (I.ii.445-46).  Prospero proceeds to try to make life miserable for Ferdinand, to which Miranda begs him not to, "O dear father,/Make not too rash a trial of him, for/He’s gentle and not fearful" (I.ii.469-70). The only time that it appears Miranda has a backbone is when she’s singing of her love’s virtues and praising him to her father in order to keep him from torturing Ferdinand.  However, it is merely a test in order to determine if Ferdinand truly loves Miranda and is not just taken over with lust by her beauty and innocence.  Miranda even goes so far as to say she will do Ferdinand's work for him, "If you’ll sit down,/I’ll bear your logs the while. Pray, give me that./I’ll carry it to the pile (III.i.23-25).  Of course Ferdinand refuses, to which Miranda expresses that she's just as able to do his work as him, "It would become me/As well as it does you, and I should do it/With much more ease, for my good will is to it/And yours it is against" (III.i.29-30).  But Miranda is willing to do what she can for Ferdinand and he is willing to do the same, they both will work hard to be with one another.

In conclusion, even though the two female characters in Shakespeare's plays are so very different, they both end up the same way: married.  Kate does eventually bend to her husband's will, while Miranda finally escapes the island to which she and her father were banished to with her husband. Do they live happily ever after? Well, the audience can decide for themselves. In the end, it didn't matter that Kate was obstinate and outspoken, nor did it matter that Miranda was naive and obeyed without fail. Because in the end, they both got what each father wanted for them, and that was to be married and taken care of for the rest of their lives.
Works Cited
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Illinois: World Library Inc., 2010. Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Web. 26 Jan 2014.